Perplexity Prompt Generator

Search-first framing with an explicit recency and evidence bar.

Research [TOPIC] with a focus on [SPECIFIC ANGLE].

Requirements:
- Sources from [TIMEFRAME] only; note the publication date of each.
- Prioritise primary sources — filings, official announcements, peer-reviewed work — over secondary commentary.
- Give the figure AND the methodology behind it wherever numbers are quoted.
- Where sources disagree, present both and say which is better supported.

Format: findings with inline citations, then a source table, then what remains uncertain.

Academic mode, with a stated inclusion standard.

Review the current literature on [RESEARCH QUESTION].

Inclusion criteria: peer-reviewed, published [TIMEFRAME], [FIELD/METHODOLOGY].

For each significant paper: the claim, the method, the sample, and the main limitation.

Then: where the field agrees, where it is contested, and what the open questions are.

Cite everything. Do not include non-peer-reviewed sources without labelling them clearly.

Buying research where criteria and constraints drive the answer.

Compare [PRODUCT A], [PRODUCT B] and [PRODUCT C] for [USE CASE].

My criteria in priority order: [1], [2], [3]. My constraints: [BUDGET, PLATFORM, TEAM SIZE].

Requirements:
- Current pricing with the date checked and a link.
- Cite the source for each capability claim — vendor marketing must be labelled as such.
- Flag anything that changed in the last [PERIOD].
- Name who each option is genuinely wrong for.

Format: comparison table, then a recommendation for my constraints.

Verification framing with an explicit verdict scale.

Fact-check this claim: "[CLAIM]"

Requirements:
- Find the original source of the claim if one exists.
- Find the strongest evidence for and against.
- Give a verdict on the scale: supported / partly supported / unsupported / contradicted / not verifiable.
- Explain what would be needed to settle it if it is not verifiable.

Cite every source with its date. Distinguish what is established from what is merely asserted.

Jurisdiction-specific research where currency matters most.

What are the current [REGULATION / COMPLIANCE] requirements for [ACTIVITY] in [JURISDICTION]?

Requirements:
- Cite the actual statute, regulation or official guidance, not summaries of it.
- State the date of the version you are citing and flag any pending changes.
- Separate hard legal requirements from best-practice recommendations.
- Note explicitly that this is not legal advice.

Format: requirements list with citations, then pending changes, then open questions for counsel.

Grounded technical research with documentation-first sourcing.

Explain how [TECHNOLOGY / SYSTEM] works, at the level of [AUDIENCE].

Requirements:
- Source from official documentation, specifications and source code where available; cite each.
- Where documentation is absent or contradicts observed behaviour, say so.
- Include the version this applies to — behaviour that changed recently must be flagged.

Format: how it works, key trade-offs, common misconceptions, sources.